|
These
are some of the books I have read or own, mostly in either English or
French. As a keen wargamer I tend to read every book I can find which
gives detailed military treatment, more patchily on the social and
political aspects. I have omitted books which are either difficult to
find or which are of only marginal interest.
|
General
Coverage
|
South
Russia
|
PolandThe
standard text on the 1920 Russo-Polish War is White Eagle, Red Star: the
Polish-Soviet War 1919-1920
by Norman Davies, although I prefer The
Battle for the
Marchlands by Adam Zamoyski
for the military detail.
The various commanders wrote on the campaign, but The march beyond the Vistula by M. Tuchachevski is more by way of protracted excuse and Year 1920 and its climax: Battle of Warsaw during the Polish-Soviet war, 1919 - 1920 by Jozef Pilsudski is a spirited rebuttal of Tuchachevski rather than a history of the campaign itself. My English copy has nice maps and the French version has some detailed notes from the Polish Military History Bureau as well. Flight of Eagles: a story of the American Kosciuszko Squadron in the Polish-Russian War 1919-1920 by Robert Karolevitz and Ross Fern is a nice tale and there are several other books on this famous unit. City fights for freedom: the rising of Lwów in 1918-1919 by Rosa Bailly is a look at the fighting around L'viv/L'vov/Lwów entirely from a Polish perspective. Coverage of this war is better in French than English. The Pilsudski, Tuchachevski and Bailly works are all in French, but there is also La Campagne polono-russe de 1920 by Wladyslaw Sikorski, which covers the 1920 campaign as a whole only in general terms but has wonderful detail for the fighting in perhaps the most vital spot in the Battle of Warsaw (where the author commanded). La Pologne en lutte pour ses frontières: 1918-1920 by Adam Przybylski is a small book, but is unusual in giving details of the fighting against the Soviets prior to 1920 (I have translated most of the 1919 section, see the history section of this site). L’Aigle blanc contre l’etoile rouge by Saint-Dizier is OK, but La Manoeuvre libératrice du maréchal Pilsudski contre les bolchéviks, août 1920: étude stratégique by Général Camon and L’Offensive militaire de l’etoile rouge contre la Pologne by Capt Charles Kuntz are very old and not terribly useful. La Guerre polono-soviétique: 1919-1920 collected by Céline Gervais is a series of academic papers which I found mostly quite dull. Finally, the journals Revue de Paris and Revue de cavalerie both contain a number of eye-witness accounts of the fighting, unfortunately concentrating almost exclusively on the cavalry (which is hardly surprising for the second). |
FinlandFinland’s
War of Independence by J O
Hannula is a nice introduction
(available in French as La Guerre
d'indépendance de Finlande).
I also enjoyed Finland and the
Russian
Revolution,
1917-1922 by C Jay Smith.
Mannerheim wrote memoirs, but I understand that the part dealing with the Finnish Civil War was left out of translations to avoid offending the Soviets. |
Greens, Blacks and PartisansThe
"Greens" were local
military groups for fought either to protect their area from other
armies or for reasons of survival. They were an important force in the
fighting, but tend to be left out of the standard histories. Behind the Front Lines of
the Civil War
by Vladimir N Brovkin is a really good introduction to them.
For various local aspects The Unknown Civil War in Russia: A study of the green movement in the Tambov region, 1920 - 1921 by Oliver Radkey is a study of one of the largest green groups, marred somewhat by the author’s near pathological dislike of every aspect of Marxism. Peasant Russia, Civil War: the Volga Countryside in Revolution 1917 - 1921 by Orlando Figes looks at another region, but I found it strangely dry from an author who is usually very enjoyable. A short article "Siberian Partisans in the Civil War" by David Footman appears in St Anthony’s Papers Number 1 (Soviet Affairs) Number One, 1956 and is quite illuminating about the difference between the reality of partisan activity and the later Soviet version of events. Then there is Nestor Makhno, poster boy for the modern anarchists who appear to overlook the fact that he was considerably better at plundering and killing than he was at providing a better life for anyone. By far the best history of him I have read is The Makhnovshchina, 1917-1921: ideology, nationalism, and peasant insurgency in early twentieth century Ukraine which is an unpublished PhD thesis by Colin Darch (who very kindly provided me with a copy). "Nestor Makhno" by David Footman appears in St Anthony’s Papers Number 6 (Soviet Affairs) Number Two, 1959 and gives the basic details pretty well. I have not read Nestor Makhno – Anarchy's Cossack: The Struggle for Free Soviets in the Ukraine 1917–1921 by Alexandre Skirda but his Nestor Makhno: Cossack Libertaire – 1888–1934 is spoiled for me by his over-riding desire to push his personal political message. La Makhnovchtchina: l'insurrection révolutionnaire en Ukraine de 1918 à 1921 by Pierre Archinoff is even more biased. |
InterventionistsOn
the whole I am not
particularly interested in the foreign interventions and do not read
much about them. The support of the Allied powers was vital to the
progress of the White armies of Denikin, Kolchak and Yudenich, but it
was financial and logistical support, not military, which was
important. Allied
Intervention in
Russia, 1917-1920 by J F N
Bradley is quite good as a start.
While the British and American interventions in the far North, Siberia and Caspian are covered in dozens of books, the French interventions are almost completely ignored. The gap annoyed me, especially since the French official history of the fighting is available and clearly contradicts the standard figures that are repeated in all general histories. The result was that I wrote a military history of the French in the Ukraine, How Odessa Became Red, with the kind assistance of Tom Hillman and Alexis Mehtidis (who provided vital material from Russian and Greek sources respectively). |
SiberiaOnly
one really good history
seems to exist that covers the Czech,
Komuch and Kolchak campaigns from a military angle: Remembering a
Forgotten War: civil war in eastern European Russia and Siberia,
1918-1920 by Serge P.
Petroff. Vladivostok
under red and white rule:
Revolution and Counterrevolution in the Russian Far East, 1920-1922
by
Canfield F. Smith is useful for the very far east after Kolchak (it
covers far more than just Vladivostok) and is a useful follow-on from
Petroff.
The Czechoslovak Legion in Russia by J F N Bradley is clearly a thesis converted into book and you would never knew that the Czechs actually fought a major campaign, so heavily political is his emphasis. For those interested in the far east, there is White Terror: Cossack Warlords of the Trans-Siberian by Jamie Bisher. I have not got a copy as it is not really my area of interest and expensive, but judging by Jamie's other stuff it will be excellent. |
Other
theatres
|
ArmourI
do not share most wargamers
obsession with vehicles, but there are a couple of indispensable texts.
Armored
Units of the Russian
Civil War: White and Allied
and its companion volume ... : Red
Army
by D Bullock and A
Deryabin are excellent on the armoured trains and good on the tanks,
but a bit thin on the armoured cars. But that’s fine because
there is Armored
Automobiles of the
Russian Civil War 1918- 1920
by Tom Hillman which fills the gap
magnificently. There is also the Russian book Tanks of the Civil War
which
Gauntlet International sells with translation.
|
MiscellaneousThe
history of the 20th Century
has too often been written by people determined to divide us all into
Left or Right, "Red" or "White", good or bad: but in the confusion of
the revolutions and civil wars there were plenty of people who moved
between these groups, whose boundaries are much more porous than the
purists will allow. Apart from the Greens, who usually favoured neither
camp, there were men who fought for both "Red" and "White" and Richard
B Spence has written about two – Boris
Savinkov: Renegade of the Left
is the story of an amazing man
who was always where the action was hottest, and the short article "Useful brigand: 'Ataman'
SN
Bulak-Balakhovich, 1917-21"
in Revolutionary
Russia,
1998 Issue 11.1 gives the basic details of another incredible character.
The Growth of the Red Army by Dimitri Daniel Fedotoff White is quite interesting, though it deals mostly with generalities. For the period before the Red Army proper came in to being one of the most important Soviet units was the Latvian Rifle Division, which is explained in The Latvian Impact on the Bolshevik Revolution: the first phase: September 1917 to April 1918 by Andrew Ezergailis. Another early military force were the "Red Guard" militias in the towns, explained in Red Guards and Workers' Militias in the Russian Revolution by Rex A. Wade. I found The Soviet Army by B. H. Liddell Hart and Histoire de l’armée rouge: la revolution et la guerre civile by Dominique Venner decent enough, without really engaging me. |
MemoirsFor
a bit of a peek at what the
actual fighting was like you have to avoid the generals and try to
piece it from the reports of the average fighting man. My favourite by
a mile in this respect is Carnets de
route d’un artilleur à cheval 1917 - 1920: Mes
Chevaux
dans la poussière et dans la boue
by Serge Mamontov, who
fought as a horse artilleryman throughout the whole war in the south.
Large parts of La Guerre en Russie et
en Siberie by L Grondijs are
also very good in this respect.
Included elsewhere on this site is the excellent The Lost Legion
by Gustav Becvar,
who fought with the Czech Legion.
The following have books have sections giving interesting details of the fighting: Arms of Valor by Pavlo Shandruk (for Ukrainian nationalists against Reds and Whites), The Unmaking of a Russian by Nicholas Wreden (with Yudenich), Russia, My Native Land: a US Engineer Reminisces and Looks at the Present by Gregory P Tschebotarioff (Whites in the South), Farewell to the Don by H N H Williamson (an Englishman’s observations in the south), Notes of a Red Guard by Eduard M. Dune (mostly early fighting in Moscow), Years Off my Life by A V Gorbatov (20 pages of his time as a low level cavalry commander), and The Wind of Morning by Hugh Boustead (an interesting 20 pages on his time in south Russia). Although containing elements of fiction, the Red Cavalry Stories by Isaac Babel is essentially an eye-witness view of what it was like in the Konnarmiya. Path of Valour by Semyon Budenny, which is only the first half of the Russian version and quite the most one-sided autobiography I have ever read (though this may only be the English translation, rather than the original) but is nonetheless required reading since he does talk about military details that most higher level commanders leave out altogether (and helps counter-balance the pro-White sources of most memoirs in English). From Tsarist General to Red Army Commander by M Bonch-Bruyevich is the interesting tale of how a man could get into the Red Army without any political thought involved, though for me it was marred somewhat by the dodgy Soviet version of history. I would recommend avoiding Memoirs of the Russian Revolution by General Loukomsky (at least in the English version) and The Grinding Mill: Reminiscences of War and Revolution in Russia, 1913-1920 by Prince A Lobanov-Rostovsky. Dull, dull, dull. The following books have some of the feel for the period, and it seems unlikely that the original author was making it all up, but there appears to be some embellishment: The Secret of Nicolas Svidine by Nicolas Svidine, White Devil of the Black Sea by Lewis Stanton Palen, and La Guerre des Rouges et des Blancs: les insurgés du Kouban by Elie Savtchenko. More "ripping yarn" than history. Another book in which it is hard to separate fact from fiction is Last Train over Rostov Bridge by Marion Aten. (Unfortunately this book is often cited as a source for British aviation in South Russia, leading to a completely false impression of the scale of the aerial fighting. If you read tales of derring-do and dog-fights by British pilots over Tsaritsyn, then the source is probably this book.) For what it was actually like in the emergent airforces I recommend Gatchina Days by Alexander Riaboff. For amusing tales in the early Red Navy try Tales of Sub-Lieutenant Ilyin by Raskolnikov (available on-line somewhere). |
Books in RussianTo
really get to grips with the
RCW one has to know Russian, which I really must get round to learning.
But armed with an understanding of the Cyrillic letters (which is easy
enough), a dictionary and an on-line translator one can sometimes get
quite a lot out of books even without knowing the language.
Гражданская Война И Военная Интервенция В СССР (Civil War and Military Intervention in the USSR) is an encyclopedia with loads of pictures and really good maps. I have even figured out some of the short divisional histories from it. Only useful for Soviet stuff though, and even then in typical style it glosses over Red defeats. Гражданская Война В России: Война С Белополяками (Civil War in Russia: War with the White Poles) by Н Какурин and В Меликов (I. Kakurin and V. Melikov) has maps and loads of tables at the rear. Белая Россия Фотоалбом (White Russia Photoalbum) published by Посев (Posev) has hundreds of photos of the Whites in all the theatres. Знциклопедиу Гражданской Войны: Велое Движение (Encyclopedia of the Civil War: White Army) lists most of the major white commanders and units. Fabulous for working out orbats and unit histories. |
TerrainI
find the tendency of
wargamers to have units with carefully researched organisations and
uniforms fighting on completely random terrain rather depressing. Until
I started reading I thought, like most people I suppose, that the
Russian steppe is one vast plain broken only by the Ural mountains. The
steppe is, however, not particularly flat in western Russia and the
Ukraine and is not particularly broken by the Urals.
A good starting point is a geography book. I use The U.S.S.R.: a Geographical Survey by Gregory and Shave because, being from 1944, the statistics about land coverage and crops grown are closer to the 1920 values than with modern books (it was also cheap). Finding good topographic maps is easy: finding affordable ones less so. I discuss some options here. |
Uniforms |